8:39
Smartphones. They can be the same but very different at the same time. This is the brand new iPhone 18 Pro Max and the Pixel 11 Pro XL. It has the same price for sure, but they all did things their way. The iPhone is built around internal and external hardware. And the Pixel is built around software and being the smartest smartphone that its own biggest fans like me are questioning. So, this is the real world experience between these two phones. Starting with the biggest talking points, the cameras. So, the first time I started flipping through the aperture settings on the 18 Pro Max is when it clicked to me why Apple made a big deal about this camera.
However, I do have to give credit where it's due because this isn't the first phone on the market to ever do a variable aperture. Samsung had it all the way back with the Galaxy S9 and the Note 9 back in 2018, flipping through f1.5 and f2.4. It didn't just stick with the Maxes. A lot of people called it gimmicky at the time. And as a result, Samsung quietly dropped it a couple of generations later. So, what makes the 18 Pro Max different is that it's not just switching between two fixed settings automatically depending on the room you're in. You're switching between four real stops. You're looking at f1.48, f1.8, f2.8, and f4. And pair that with actual manual controls now built into
the native app thanks to Pixel that did it before. You can now control the aperture, the shutter speed, white balance, a histogram, and stuff that you need a third-party app to do. And for the first time in years, the iPhone's camera has felt like it's trusting me to know what to do instead of doing everything for me. On the other hand, the Pixel is just different. If you hand the Pixel to someone and you just watch them zooming on something across the street, it is basically a party trick at this point, and the 11 Pro XL keeps that party trick going. And that's what Google is really looking for with the 11 Pro XL. reach and immediiacy over control. Now, the main sensor is a 50
megapixel lens, which is the same as last year, but the real jump is the periscope telephoto lens because you're getting true 5x optical zoom, and Google's pro zoom mode pushes digitally all the way to 120x, which sounds ridiculous on paper because it actually is. Google also leaned hard into Gemini intelligence and helping with the camera. When you have things like magic capture and night sights, which got like a huge bump thanks to the new tensor chip, you know, low light pictures come together almost instantly instead of making you hold still for a few seconds. I pulled up different shots from both phones side by side before filming this. And in daytime, the iPhone's pictures are closer to what your eyes actually
see. It is more neutral and it looks less processed. The images from the Pixel come out a lot punchier and a lot more contrasty straight off the sensor because Google is leaning very hard into computational HDR. And with video, I just think the Pixel is failing really badly at this because at a default setting, the Pixel video comes out washed and a little flat. And zooming between lenses is jerky instead of smooth, which is very annoying. And that held up across basically every clip that I took. Stabilization also has real gaps, especially on walking shots and at the long end of the zoom. Contrast blows out in bright or HDR scenes and low light footage picks up noise and some inconsistent colors cast and that's
before you even turn on video boost which is a feature that Google keeps talking about in every single keynote. I don't really know why. Shoot 4K 60 HDR and turn it on and it quietly drops your capture down to 30 frames per second before it even uploads then fix the other half of the frame with AI to hand you back something that looks like 60 frames per second. The iPhone doesn't have any of these problems. They don't do that because it isn't trying to fix your footage after the fact. It is capturing it right there in real time. ProRes raw records the actual sensor data straight to the phone or an external drive over USB type-C. Apple gives you a real flat profile that you can use to color grade it later in
whatever software you use. You know, Da Vinci, Final Cuts, the same workflow people use on actual cinema cameras. And that's why you see actual commercials, actual Hollywood movies, or even Apple events on an iPhone. Now, we weak with the software, and this is just Android versus iOS debates that we've [snorts] had for the last couple of years. And the 18 Pro Max ships on iOS 27. And the biggest change this year isn't visual. It's more or less just Siri. And Apple is rolling out what they're calling Siri AI. It is a rebuilt assistant that is supposed to be more personal and actually useful, which if you've touched Siri at any point in the last decade,
you know that this was overdue. So, I was on the wait list for a couple of days before I finally got into it. And I think it is very silly because for a phone that costs around 1,300 USD, you can't even use the AI features on day one. Makes no sense. But beyond that, it is the iOS experience that you already know. It is clean. It is consistent and is locked away into the Apple ecosystem in a way that either doesn't bother you at all or bothers you constantly depending on what else you own. while the Pixel 11 Pro XL runs on Android 17 and with Gemini intelligence built in at a system level making this one of the smartest smartphones on the market. Then there is a support window which gives
you 7 years of OS and security patches which is pretty good. Then you also add Pixel Drop updates on top of that which is one of the best in the entire industry. I think that software wise it is a no-brainer that the Pixel is the overall winner. I just think it does more with your phone than what the iPhone can do. And the fact that Siri AI or Apple intelligence isn't available immediately in North America is insane. And the fact that it's not even available in the EU is more insane. It is what it is. Hardware is where you really feel the differences between these two phones because Apple is running the new 820 Pro, which is their first chip built on a 2 nanome process.
It has a six core CPU, seven core GPU, and a beefed up neuro engine with 50% more memory bandwidth than last year. And on paper, it is a real jump. But in practice, what you notice is that the phone barely gets warm anymore. I threw heavy 4K exports and long gaming sessions, I did back to back. And where the iPhone 17 Pro Max used to start throttling or heating up in my hands after 15 minutes or 20 minutes, the 18 Pro Max just kept going. The build quality is still the same aluminum uni-body build with a ceramic shield on the front and on the back. It has the same 6.9 in display and the dynamic island has shrunk down a little bit and handles three live activities instead of two. I barely noticed it
before and I don't think I would notice it now. While the Pixel 11 Pro XL takes a completely different path. And honestly, this is where the story got a lot less flattering for Google the more I dug into it. The Tensor G6 was rumored all year to finally jump Google onto the TSMC's 2nometer process, the same node Apple is using on the A20 Pro, and that didn't happen at all. And to make matters worse, Qualcomm has already announced the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 at the September summit having a 2nome process as well. So heading into 2027, Google is the only major chipmaker on the market that has this old process, while Apple and Qualcomm have already jumped the ship and moved on to something better. As for the phone
itself, it is still lighter in my hand than the iPhone 18 Pro Max. The Pro XL keeps that last year's camera bar shape. It just lost some of the metal trim around it. The display got an increase in its brightness. And I noticed it almost outside on a very sunny day. You know, you're texting and taking pictures and it stays legible without me copying my hands over the screen to see, you know, to see my screen. Then there's highlights, which is a notification system that doubles as the camera flash. You flip the phone face down and it glows a specific color for a specific contact calling you or while you're mid-con conversation with Gemini so you know what's going on with your phone without even picking it up. It is
a small touch and I do find myself glancing at it every now and then. But I will say I don't really see a use case cuz I think it is a very huge gimmick. And another thing, I don't know if this is a nitpick at this point because it is a big deal, but the base 256 gig of the Pixel 11 Pro XL comes with 12 gigs this year instead of 16 gigs from last year. This is across all board, and you feel that in small ways. You know, the apps reload a little more than they usually do when you're browsing between different tabs or the Gemini feature taking a little more time to kick in than it did last year. And to be fair to Google, they still have a better ceiling. If you want to step up to 512 gigs, for example, you get 16 gigs of RAM back, and that option
doesn't exist on the iPhone at any price. Apple caps every single 18 Pro Max at 12 gigs, no matter how much storage you buy. Battery life to me is a landslide. I think the battery life on the iPhone 18 Pro Max is ridiculous. I kid you not, it took me 2 days to kill this phone. Apple is calling the 18 Pro Max the longest battery life of any iPhone they've ever made. And I think that is actually correct. It is 5,391 million of battery, and I use this for my everyday use. High brightness, social media stuff, pictures and videos, video calls, all the things that I would do with a smartphone. It is very impressive how efficient the A20 Pro chip is. Even charging is also pretty good. You can
hit about 50% in 15 minutes with a 60W charger. and it does outlast the Pixel for sure. The Pixel, on the other hand, has a 5,150 mAh of battery, which is slightly lower than what we saw on the Pixel 10 Pro XL because Google is betting that the new Tensor G6's efficiency on its 3 nome process makes up for that difference. And on paper, it should help, and it does help. And this is comfortably a 1day phone without any issues. And in isolation, it is a great battery life. But when compared with the iPhone, for example, it does fall short. Now, let's get into the price because both phones start at $1299 USD for 256 gigs. But if you want to upgrade to a higher tier, then it tells a different story. The iPhone 18 Pro Max goes up to
$1899 for a terabyte of storage. And Apple even added a new 2 TB option this year at $24.99, all running the same 820 Pro chip, no matter which storage you pick. While the Pixel 11 Pro XL goes up to 1649 USD for a terabyte of storage. So, the Pixel is significantly cheaper and put it simply, at the base here, the iPhone does give you more phone for $12.99. So, what do I really think about all this? It is definitely different than what I expected when I started writing the script of this video because walking through this section by section, a pattern kept showing up that I wasn't fully expecting. The things that the audience cares about the most, the camera, the battery, the performance,
are exactly where Apple pushed the hardest this generation and exactly where the Pixel barely even moved the needle. The iPhone 18 Pro Max brought a real variable aperture, the longest battery life in any iPhone that's ever been made, and a chip that is now a full process ahead of anything Google is shipping. Meanwhile, the Pixel 11 Pro XL is running the same manufacturing process as last year's phone, and it also has a smaller battery than last year's phone and video that I feel is inferior to whatever the iPhone has. None of that makes the Pixel a bad phone. It is still cheaper than the iPhone when looking at this from a space and RAM perspective. I think Gemini is
better than anything Apple is doing when it comes to Siri AI, and I think those are legitimate reasons to get the Pixel. But when I add up the categories that decide whether a phone feels good in my everyday use, I think the iPhone 18 Pro Max is the one that moved the needle for me this year. And I think the Pixel is the one that is still or the one that is coasting when it comes to their smartphones. And it is particularly worrying for me because as someone who wants Android to be competitive, if Google can match this kind of push in 2026 or 2027, especially with Snapdragon's newest chip about to be in the wild, that gap is not going to get smaller. So, with that, I think the iPhone might be the better pick between
these two phones. But what is your pick? Let me know down in the comments below. And if you want to know everything about the Google Book, please click right here. And if you want to see how the Galaxy Z48 has held up in the last month, click right
