58:25
During the manufactured COVID crisis, many falsehoods and outright lies were pushed out to the public, not the least of which was the narrative that the vaccines produced by the big pharma companies had developed effective preventatives and treatments. These were promoted as the only reliable FDA-approved medicines. These vaccines received record-breaking overnight FDA approval. There were no lengthy trials or proven efficacy research. The big pharma companies were given immunity from liability for their products, the first time in history that this had ever happened.
However, there was a problem. There were brilliant minds in the medical and research communities who took issue with these claims. But these independent voices did not have the same access to power as the large pharmaceutical companies, their armies of lobbyists, and the politicians in their pockets who held personal investments in those companies. Then there was a long-running controversy over cancer treatments and what should be used to treat various forms of the disease. Many medical professionals preferred to use the same compounds for some cancer treatments, medications with a long history of proven success, just as was offered for treating COVID, which is just a form of influenza. These were also dismissed.
These voices were silenced, and the Biden administration pushed mandatory vaccines. Those who refused lost their jobs and careers, and many in the military were punished or discharged for not accepting the propaganda. Then there were the alternative proven treatments that were disregarded. Why did all that happen? Let's find out. Why was there controversy over treatments? Who benefited from vaccine enforcement? Why were dissenting opinions dismissed? Who were the criminals here? Hello, I'm Colin Heaton, former history professor, Army Marine Corps veteran, and welcome to this episode of Forgotten History.
Beginning of the toughest 26 days in Marine Corps history. With confidence in our armed forces. 36th President of the United States died this afternoon. Tell them there are children and women in here to call it off. When COVID arrived from China, it attacked the world with a vengeance. Suddenly, in the US, the major pharmaceutical companies miraculously delivered what was touted as a miracle drug. These unproven serums were then made mandatory for federal workers, and many states made it a requirement for people
to keep their jobs and for children to attend school. But there were warnings from professional research and the medical community, and alternative medicines were mentioned. The World Health Organization in March 2021 said that ivermectin should only be used for COVID-19 in clinical trials, and the FDA says it was never authorized or approved for preventing or treating COVID-19. But they approved the vaccines without any efficacy studies, and ivermectin and other drugs had a long history of effectiveness. The problem was that they were readily available and much cheaper, and cheaper drugs do not make companies big money.
Many doctors and researchers were publicly criticized, platformed less, investigated, sued, disciplined, or stripped of credentials for promoting ivermectin for COVID-19. The pushback was usually not because they mentioned ivermectin at all, but because they were accused of promoting it despite weak or negative evidence, outside guidelines, or in ways seen as misinformation or substandard care. But at least they had decades of studies and a track record of effectiveness. The WHO, EMA, FDA, and others advised against routine ivermectin use for COVID outside trials because it cut into the profits and portfolios of people in power. The most powerful voice against fellow professionals advocating for
other treatments was Dr. Anthony Fauci. His greed and ego knew no bounds, and he was also responsible for the development of pathogens, including COVID, at the Wuhan Laboratory in China. He later lied under oath to Congress about his involvement while being a major investor in these companies. The primary persons attacked by Fauci, the liberal media, politicians, and lawyers supporting big pharma were Pierre Kory, MD, who promoted ivermectin in Senate testimony and through the FLCCC, calling it highly effective. The American Board of Internal Medicine revoked his certifications over what they called COVID misinformation.
Paul Marik, MD, Kory's closest high-profile counterpart in the FLCCC, he became a central public advocate for ivermectin protocols and drew the same kind of backlash. Criticism that he was promoting an unproven treatment contrary to evolving evidence and major guidelines. He also lost his certification. Tess Lawrie, PhD, had backlash regarding alternative treatments. Doctors Brian Tyson and George Fareed publicly promoted ivermectin-based early treatment protocols. Tyson was a plaintiff in litigation challenging California's COVID misinformation law. Doctors Lee Tran Hoang and Brian Tyson later sued federal agencies arguing FDA messaging about ivermectin interfered with medical practice. They were in trouble for prescribing promoting ivermectin for COVID while federal
agencies maintained it was not approved and the evidence did not show effectiveness. That was a lie. Ivermectin was developed from the discovery of avermectin by Satoshi Omura and William C. Campbell. Omura isolated the relevant soil microorganism, and Campbell helped identify and develop the compound that led to ivermectin. They shared the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for that work. Marik then developed it into the drug marketed as Mectizan. Ivermectin is not an antibiotic in the usual sense. It is primarily an antiparasitic drug. The FDA describes ivermectin as part of the avermectin class of broad-spectrum antiparasitic
agents. They were shown to be very effective in some cancer treatments and other illnesses as they killed parasites in the human body and reduced tumors in cancer patients. Some reports stated that ivermectin was more effective and the disease responded faster and more effectively than radiation and chemotherapy. If ivermectin and its derivatives are so effective, why would the government allow people to die and not give them the choice of which drug to use? The simple answer is greed, and that goes for cancer treatments as well. For decades, research has been suppressed regarding effective treatments for cancer as the Soviet Union conducted serious cancer research with reports that some cancers were
eradicated and many others were reduced with patients in remission. The P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute used radiation therapy as early as the late 1920s and 1930s, and the later Dr. Nikolai Blokhin Center became the flagship Soviet cancer institution. Soviet oncology expanded through centralized institutes, postgraduate training, radiotherapy departments, and nationwide referral networks, which studied cancer for more than a century and remains central to Russian oncology history today. Soviet doctors worked on the same basic fronts as the West, surgery, radiation, pathology, and drug therapy. In other words, they were fighting cancer the old-fashioned way, cut it out, burn it, poison it, and hope science outruns the disease.
A major figure in Soviet oncology was Nikolai Blokhin, who helped establish clinical chemotherapy as a serious field in the USSR, playing a major role in developing Russian drug treatment for malignant tumors. And another review traces Soviet antineoplastic chemotherapy back to the 1950s, including work led by Blokhin developing effective anticancer drugs now known as oncolytic virotherapy used to target tumors. A declassified CIA report on USSR tissue therapies noted claimed benefits and preliminary observations, including interest in neoplastic disease, but the reporting did not amount to proof of established cancer cures across the board, but remissions and tumor
reductions were noted. A declassified 1951 Cold War intelligence report reviewed a 1950 paper by Moscow State University Professor V.V. Alpatov, a scientist who had also conducted research in the United States. Parasitic worms and certain malignant tumors may use the same biological playbook. His research suggested that two very different threats to the body could survive, evade, and grow in surprisingly similar ways called shared survival strategy. Research showed that they survive and function in low-oxygen environments where most cells struggle, and store extra energy called glycogen to keep themselves fueled, an unusual way of producing energy and able to operate with or without oxygen, unlike normal
cells. Then there was Blokhin himself, who is widely credited with helping establish Soviet clinical chemotherapy and building the Soviet Union's top cancer center. By the late 1950s, Soviet teams were using sarcolysin, a nitrogen mustard derivative related to melphalan, in cancer treatment, and Russian-language literature documents its use in diseases such as multiple myeloma. Parasitic treatments were also working to address many cancers. Their results were staggering. The drug Miracle D, used for parasitic infections, showed signs of slowing tumor growth. Guanazolo appeared to block cancer cells from replicating,
interfering with their ability to spread, and tumor cells reacted differently that helped these cells when exposed to certain compounds. This research proved that multiple medications existed that can be used both actively and preventatively for cancer and parasites, and that included COVID. The possible reason why the old Soviet studies were deemed effective was that there were no large drug companies controlling and suppressing research to push profit-making treatments. There were no politicians in power with large investments sitting on committees directing legal traffic to get wealthy.
There were no lobbyists and soft money to bribe politicians to support the drug companies block resistance to generate profits. Modern cancer care is still built around combinations of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy, depending on the tumor type and stage. But, when it comes to using cheaper effective treatments, the backlash begins, just like with COVID. These are the treatments that have been proven effective that big pharma and politicians never want to be used. Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning recognized discovery, was used globally since the 1980s to treat all forms of parasitic infections and was
FDA-approved for multiple parasitic conditions, which tends to counter their argument that if it can't be used for COVID. It has been prescribed millions of times worldwide. These include oral ivermectin, ivermectin plus mebendazole, which is a broader coverage combination, topical ivermectin for skin-related conditions. So, if these drugs are all proven to be effective for a myriad of diseases, often manufactured by the same companies that produced the various COVID vaccines, then why try and debunk them as not being viable? The answer is simple. A new drug, no corporate liability, a large global population, a media and government willing to push them into the professional and personal lives of people, often against their will, to
make a massive profit. But, what about the side effects and even deaths attributed to the vaccines? Side effects include anaphylaxis, a severe allergic reaction. CDC has described this as rare, around five cases per million doses in earlier US monitoring. Myocarditis and pericarditis, inflammation of the heart muscle or lining around the heart, mainly linked to the mRNA vaccines and seen most often in adolescent and young adult males, especially after the second dose. CDC and FDA list this as a known risk, but their numbers are questionable. Thrombosis and thrombosepathemia syndrome, or TTS, is rare, but serious blood clots with low platelets linked to the J&J Janssen vaccine occurred. CDC described it with higher rates in women ages 30 to 49.
Guillain-Barré syndrome, a rare neurological disorder, also recognized with the J&J Janssen vaccine. Capillary leak syndrome, a very rare but serious reaction, flagged also for J&J Janssen, and EMA advised against using that vaccine in people with a prior history of it. I should mention that the CDC and FDA identified nine deaths casually associated with the J&J Janssen vaccine tied to TTS. CDC's archived safety page states this directly. The FDA's reviews earlier documented eight confirmed TTS deaths in a prior analysis, and later analyses supported the seriousness of that risk. However, what is of interest is the fact that nearly every death
during COVID, to include gunshot victims, were labeled as COVID-19 related, but the massive numbers of deaths and debilitations in patients who received the shots, especially the boosters, are specifically labeled as unrelated, even in perfectly healthy young people. The great lie, as perpetrated by Dr. Fauci and TV fake journalists like Rachel Maddow, all claimed one shot would eliminate your exposure and you also could not be a carrier. When that proved untrue, they pushed the boosters, with some people getting many shots, and many of those having serious medical issues. Still, they attacked professionals offering cheaper, proven, and safer, effective treatments.
Hospitals were not allowed to use them, and insurance companies, another great criminal enterprise, would not cover those costs. As a result of the new research that disproved the efficacy of the COVID vaccines and highlighting the side effects, which were warned against by those attacked by big pharma, lawsuits have been filed, the paperwork flying like shrapnel. Medical professionals who were stripped of credentials and blacklisted have been exonerated and should see massive paydays.
There is also a move in Congress to remove the liability protections for the big pharma companies, and they can do it because contrary research information was withheld from public scrutiny, which is deception by fraud. So, who are the criminals? Fauci and the scientist, and see our video on Fauci, who violated international law creating and weaponizing viruses in a Chinese lab, the big pharma companies who rapidly created an unproven and sometimes toxic vaccine, the politicians and lawyers who were heavily invested financially and forced tens of millions of people to take them, or the liberal media who went along with the lie assisting all of the above in doing great harm. Who were the criminals? We'll let you decide.
Thank you for watching this episode of Forgotten History. If you like what you saw, please click like, share, and subscribe. And, if you would like to assist with the ever-increasing cost of production, please consider becoming a channel member and joining our Patreon page.
