9:20
Luxor, Egypt. Here, along the east bank of the Nile River, lie the archaeological remains of the vast Karnak Temple complex, dating back to the 32nd century BC. With its numerous structures, including great halls, obelisks, and an avenue of sphinxes, Karnak represents the collective achievement of many generations of ancient Egyptian builders. When one travels to Luxor and contemplates the Temple of Karnak, one sees great pillars, obelisks of enormous size, and what is amazing about this area is that it is one of the few places where more than 30 pharaohs contributed to its great size and wealth of knowledge over a vast period of time. For centuries, archaeologists and scholars have regarded Karnak as one of the most
dramatic examples of the remarkable technological skill of early man. But do the construction techniques used in these incredible monuments reveal evidence of something more? Something that is not of this world. When we start looking at hieroglyphs, we are amazed at how beautifully and carefully they have been carved. The technology we see is clearly of a beautiful perfection that almost makes your heart weep every time you come face to face with it. Experts believe that the most impressive evidence of advanced machining can be found in the tall, four-sided monuments of Karnak called obelisks.
The obelisk is carved with the same inscriptions on all four sides, and they are all exactly the same, with hieroglyphs beautifully cut and articulated in this red granite stone Today we would look at it and say that it must have been some kind of machine that carved these things. For example, there were slots. They were only 0.14 inches wide and 1/2 inch deep. When you look inside, you can see that the background was made by a rotary tool. So, this was a tool that drilled, came out, went down one level, drilled, and came out. A human hand, no matter how good it is, can never do that. The tool marks, the precision, the depth, the rotary impressions that were made were not done by hand. Some of them were engraved with such
precision that they required mechanical tools to achieve it. The toolkit that we see that the ancient Egyptians supposedly used, there is no way that any of those tools could have produced the results we saw. For many scholars, the apparent precision used in the construction of the obelisks at Karnak suggests a 21st-century level of expertise Precision is what our civilization is built on. 10,000 of an inch or 1/1,000 of an inch is quite common nowadays because that tolerance or precision is necessary and serves a purpose. But how can we explain such precision in ancient construction? If you look at the statue of Ramses, it is
so perfect that you wonder how it was made with supposedly primitive tools. Because nowadays we could only do it with machines. So, the way we check the symmetry of the Ramses statue is by taking two images of the same photographs, making transparencies and comparing the left with the right. We turn it over and place it on top of the original. And as we can see, we have a perfect match. The ancient Egyptians were very skilled at working with granite. I don't see how they could have created what they created with the tools commonly accepted in the toolbox of the ancient Egyptians, such as copper or stone chisels, wooden mallets, or
stone balls. But if, as many historians and archaeologists maintain, the ancient builders did not possess the equivalent of modern tools, how were these monuments constructed with such mathematical precision? Perhaps the answer can be found by comparing an example of ancient sculpture with one made using more modern methods. We can compare the aluminum model to the face machine. The stretch marks running down the face are similar to the stretch marks running down the face of the statue of Karnak in Egypt. And also the tool marks we see above the brow, that excavation there, which shows us what kind of tools or the shape of the tools they used. Therefore, the elements that link this machining to ancient statuary
are not only symmetry, but also geometry, precision, and tool marks. And we have all three elements in modern machining and in ancient statuary. It is something extremely difficult to do by hand without resorting to some mechanical assistance. I think it's impossible. But if the tool marks seen on the statue of Ramses appear identical to those made by modern methods, wouldn't that prove that the ancient builders had access to machines and perhaps even electricity? They supposedly had no electricity or power tools. They were n't supposed to have diamond saws. And yet, they are doing things that would require precision work and precision tools. So where did they get those things? How could they have had these
advanced machining tools that we have only just acquired in our civilization today? So, one answer would have to be that they obtained them from ancient aliens. Kingman, Arizona, May 1953. At the height of the Cold War, an unidentified object reportedly crashed in the desert sands. What remained was supposedly sent to America's most top-secret facility, Area 51. But it wasn't until 45 years later, in 1998, that a retired military engineer named Bill Uhouse came forward to make an astonishing claim. The army not only had extraterrestrial technology, they had a live alien.
Uhouse claimed that he worked in a secret laboratory, supposedly in the Papoose Mountains of Area 51 in Nevada, and that since 1953, the US government had an insectoid alien working with them. His name was J-Rod. J-Rod allegedly helped the military understand and duplicate the incredible power systems and futuristic technology that were combined and created for Kingman's ship. Shortly after Bill Uhouse revealed the story, microbiologist Dan Burisch came forward to confirm his claim. But according to Dan Burisch, J-Rod claimed he wasn't an alien. What she revealed was even more shocking.
This insectoid alien, J-Rod, said that he actually came from our future. And that at some point close to our present, a catastrophe occurs on this planet. And much of humanity is destroyed. And that humanity is divided into two different species. And one of these species goes and lives underground. And while they are underground, they develop these insectoid traits. Which is exactly what Hopi, Zuni, and even Navajo legends say. That during the transition period between the third and fourth worlds, this current upper world was not habitable and they had to go underground to live for a time with what they called the ant people. And one has to wonder if perhaps J-Rod is actually an insectoid human from our own future.
Could J-Rod's accounts confirm that the Hopi stories about the ant people were more than just mythology? And if so-called insectoids really exist, is it possible that they are not aliens, but humans from the future? Aliens appear to be part of our human evolution over thousands of years. It has a lot to do with our reproductive systems. Perhaps they are trying to create a new race, possibly capable of withstanding atmospheric changes here on Earth, or potentially leading us to a point where we have to abandon the planet. But if humans are one day forced underground by a
cataclysmic event, does it make scientific sense for us to evolve to have insect-like characteristics? According to some scientists, we are already part insect. Work on the human genome has indicated that possibly up to half of our DNA is the result of transposons. That's a sophisticated term for jumping genes, genes that can jump from one species to another. It was recently shown that the Rhodnius, that sap-sucking insect that spreads Chagas disease, can not only transmit the trypanosome, the agent that causes the disease, from one organism to another, but can also transmit its own genes to those organisms. Humans contract
Chagas disease. So far, they have not analyzed humans for this insect DNA. It is likely that we have some of these insect genes in our system. We know that some of these transposons probably came from diseases we contracted when our ancestors were bitten by insects. Puma Punku is a large temple complex located on a plateau in Bolivia. Conventional archaeologists date the site to approximately 200 BC. The people who lived here had no written language or wheel. However, somehow they built one of the most complex structures in the world. Ancient alien theorists see Puma Punku as clear evidence of extraterrestrial influence.
The ruins we found at Puma Punku are simply extraordinary. Puma Punku defies logic. The interest of Puma Punku is not so much that the individual stones fit together perfectly, but the fact that the stones themselves have such a tremendous design that it requires mathematical concepts that go far beyond what we currently use. However, somehow in the past someone did that for a specific purpose and in a way that even today's computer programs would say, "How is this possible?" In the highlands of Bolivia, Pumapunku. Some of these blocks weigh more than 40 to 50 tons each. What can you tell us about this Well, they had their stone-cutting skills, you know, pretty well honed for being 5,000 years old. I mean, it's almost
unbelievable. But these cutting plans they have here are very impressive. And some of the inside cuts, look, like here, all these inside cuts, are very difficult to make. I mean, it would be difficult for us with our team to achieve that kind of precision. Let's talk a little about the inner boxes. Oh, I was afraid you were going to bring something like that up. That's an incredible piece of work. I mean, if we were to do something like that today, we'd use what they have, those computer-controlled CNC machines that have diamond tips and a template that, you know, the computer follows, and even then it might not come out perfect. Because even though you can see that this piece obviously broke, Mhm.
Nowhere here can you see any imperfection. It's like, and by the way, when you're there, if you run your finger along these edges and apply a little pressure, you can cut yourself. That's how sharp the edges are. But where could ancient peoples have developed such technology? Is it really possible that extraterrestrial visitors provided different construction methods and tools When I saw these blocks, I really didn't think they had been cut. My first thought was that this looks very similar to Frank Lloyd Wright 's textile block construction system, which he used in his California homes in the early 1920s. What he did was take concrete and pour it into molds. ability to soften stone. In Sacsayhuaman, for example, we find
these gigantic stone blocks, gigantic walls where it seems as if those stones had been melted, placed in their place and then hardened again. London, England, 1986. Sergeant Melvin E. Brown, who served in the 509th Atomic Bombardment Squadron for the U.S. Army Air Forces. The U.S. is on his deathbed in a local hospital. With his last words, Brown reveals to his family a secret he had kept hidden for almost 40 years. A secret about what he saw in 1947 when he was stationed in Roswell, New Mexico. Sergeant Melvin Brown is another key player in all of this. He was surrounded by a high-ranking officer after the accident.
Basically, he was put on guard duty. And oddly enough, there were some low-bed trucks with tarpaulins on top. At the first opportunity he had, he took a look inside the truck. And there, under a tarp, were two of the bodies from the accident site. When he was on his deathbed, he mentioned Roswell. Days before he died, he said that he was not a weather balloon. He wasn't from here, and I saw two of the bodies, and they weren't human. The deathbed testimony is a critical part of the Roswell story. There are several. There are many reasons why some of the witnesses remained silent for so long. Fear, threats, all of this plays a role.
Many UFO researchers believe that, like these deathbed testimonies, it is only a matter of time before physical evidence of a crashed alien spacecraft finally appears. And some even suggest that such evidence has already been recovered. Albuquerque, New Mexico. Oh, here it is, right here. One day after discovering wires near the Roswell disposal site, Giorgio Tsoukalos and Linda Moulton Howe traveled to the Theta Plate laboratory, where they were greeted by the owner, Aaron Velasquez. Hello. It's a pleasure to finally meet you all. Welcome. Aaron. Geologist Frank Kimbler arrived first with the metal fragments he has collected over the past 8 years in and around the crash site in Roswell.
Hello, hello, Frank. It's so good to see you again. It's good to see you all. It's been a good job. Ready for some tests. We're ready to do some testing. This is the exciting part. I've been waiting for this. Professor Kimbler's fragments will be scientifically analyzed along with the cables found in the desert yesterday to determine their elemental composition. It is an X-ray fluorescence machine. It can perform material identification. We're going to hit it with an X-ray beam and it will tell us what it can tell us.
It has the ability to show us the elements that are here within a certain range. It's right? Correct. Okay, here we go. We see a large spike here. This is iron. OK. What else seems to match? Wow. What's the selenium doing there? I know that selenium is used in the electronics industry for semiconductors. Let's move on and take a look at the second cable, please. The composition of the second cable fragment appears to be almost identical to that of the first. Could the presence of selenium, a semiconductor, indicate that they were part of an electronic device?
Frank has also brought with him several pieces of metal that he has collected in the same area over the years and that he has not yet tested. It seems to match the iron, but that little shoulder makes me curious. Copper. OK. Copper. It's an exact copper match. So, we know they have some copper. And then, this here. I'd say it's a good match with zirconium. This is a good match with molybdenum. So now we not only have zirconium, but we also have molybdenum. And those are considered impurities, Giorgio, but they shouldn't be there. But what do you mean when you say they shouldn't be there?
Because that's unusual for any alloy I've examined before. It's part of our high-tech industry. It 's strange for me too. So, you would see molybdenum in a stainless steel, but not in an iron and copper alloy. Yes. Yes, I agree with that. And zirconium has been found in some cases where the material has been analyzed and was somehow related to a shock. I came across that myself. In 2009, a Freedom of Information Act request brought to light a research study conducted at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in 1949, the site in Ohio where the Roswell remains were taken. According to the
published documents, metallurgists discovered zirconium while examining pieces of strange metal recovered in the New Mexico desert. Is this a piece you found where we were walking? Absolutely. In fact, if we could bring the image back, there's a small but interesting part to it, because this is the one I talked about earlier that has an explosive crater because it went through an explosion, and I can show and prove it in that piece. So, you want me to scan around? Do you see that right there? That gap? That hole right there is an explosive crater.
Explosive crater? Could this curious feature indicate that the metal fragments Frank found in separate locations near Roswell came from objects that exploded? Perhaps even one or more extraterrestrial spacecraft. As the team analyzes the remaining metal fragments, they are surprised to discover that almost all of them appear to have the same elemental composition. There is definitely a similarity. I mean, it looks like it's the same material, just in different proportions. Because?
