10:15
Adobe is making more money than at any point in its 40-year history… so why is Wall Street acting like it's watching a company die in real time? Something doesn't add up. While the internet is distracted by a $150 million FTC lawsuit over hidden cancellation fees, a much bigger story is slipping under the radar. One that almost nobody is talking about. Adobe's valuation has been sliding. Its long-time CEO of 18 years just stepped down. And in one of the strangest moves in recent tech history, the company spent a billion dollars on a merger… that never even happened.
The "industry standard" isn't just bleeding out… it's building a system that could replace the very people it depends on. Chapter 1 - The Billion Dollar Phantom Adobe's sales keep going up and up. The company posted a $23.77 billion dollar revenue mark for 2025. But it's stock? That's a different story. It's only going in one direction… down. It's lost nearly a third of its value over the last year alone, ending 2025 with a stock price of just under $350 a share. Since then, it's been a steep decline, with the stock closing out April 2026 with a price of $246. Sure, it's not bottoming out, but the trends aren't good at
all. They're even uglier when you look at the Price-to-Earnings ratio. That's down to 14.17, compared to a peak of 152.98 back in 2014. It's been on a consistent slide since 2024. Behind the scenes, everything is going wrong for Adobe. Adobe designed itself to be indispensable, a one-stop shop for everything web design. It was the default tool for the digital generation to use. And it seemed to be working. At its current height of users, Adobe boasts numbers of over 850 million active users.
There's just one problem. They're not happy. Few people are. Over the last year, Adobe has been dealing with one piece of bad news after another. They were forced to pay a crushing settlement to the government after their deceptive practices were exposed. Their big-budget merger with Figma was scuttled at the last second, leaving Adobe on the hook for a massive breakup fee. With new pretenders on the scene offering alternative, easier to use products, it was clear something needed to change. Adobe was going to have to innovate from within rather than just buying the competition. Instead, they swung the axe. The ultimate sign of a coming disaster for Adobe came from the resignation of CEO Shantanu Narayen,
who had been in charge since 2007. He was the man who turned the company into the powerhouse it is. He was also the one who made every one of the decisions that brought it down. But more observers and Adobe subscribers alike are saying a change at the top won't fix what's wrong. Can Adobe turn it around - or is Adobe's entire business model flawed? Does Adobe have loyalists like other tech companies - or hostages who are finally able to get out? Chapter 2 - The Subscription Debt Trap Adobe was a pioneer in the software game, but the model it developed not
only caused its own downfall, and put the entire internet on the path to decline. Most people don't just buy one Adobe product, they buy into the whole ecosystem. The most popular option is Adobe Creative Cloud All Apps plan, which gives you tools like Photoshop, Illustrator, Premiere Pro, and InDesign. Basically everything you'd need to create anything. But it didn't always work like that. Back in the day, you had to buy each app outright. One program could cost you around $700 and the full creative suite selling between $1500 and $2600.
It was expensive. But once you paid, it was yours… at least until it became obsolete. Today, Adobe knows how to keep you paying. Welcome to Software as a Service, or SaaS. It's an internet provider's dream come true, and a buyer's worst nightmare. As everything moved online, software started changing too. And Adobe followed that shift. Instead of selling you a product once, they turned it into a subscription. Today, Adobe customers sign up on the website and pick the plan that fits them. The most basic plan, featuring limited storage, can be had for as little as $9.99 a month. But for heavy users or professionals,
the top-capacity plan with top-of-the-line features will cost between $70 to $105 a month. And you'll be paying that forever… as long as they don't raise the price. It's not hard to see why this is seen as a win for the company. They no longer need to concentrate on winning over new buyers every month. Instead, they've built themselves a base of passive income, where the same people pay them each and every month. The first month will seem cheap by comparison to the original suite, but let's look at the high end. A high-end Adobe suite costing $2,600 would only take
about two years to surpass in price if you were paying for the most expensive option monthly. At least you can always cancel when you're done…right? Subscription as a Service works best for companies because people will simply forget about the small payment each month unless money is extremely tight. This is one of the main sources of income for streaming services. People keep them casually rather than going through the trouble of cancelling. But in the case of heavier subscription plans, where the money is noticeable,
more people might be inclined to cancel if they're not using or liking the service anymore. That is, if they can figure out how. Adobe is far from the only company to do SaaS, but it got into the most trouble for its business model. In June 2024, the Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Adobe for predatory practices that essentially locked customers into a subscription. The main complaint centered around the popular "Annual Paid Monthly" subscription, which carried a hefty early termination fee that
could cost customers hundreds of dollars if they tried to get out of the yearly deal. Not only was the company not upfront about this, but it set this subscription deal as the pre-set default, only showing the monthly cost. Many people signed up and then were in for an unpleasant surprise. Like a lot of subscription services, Adobe didn't make it easy to leave. The fine print was buried, and the cancellation button wasn't exactly front and center. Turning off the auto-renew wasn't really an option either. So if you wanted to cancel after a year,
you had to time it perfectly. Cancel too early, and you'd get hit with a fee. Cancel too late, and it rolls into another year… and the whole cycle starts again. The government had Adobe dead to rights. They argued the company was breaking consumer protection laws by making it so hard to cancel. Those who tried were met with frustrating mazes of steps, unsolicited offers, and intimidating warnings. And it would cost Adobe $150 million with part of it going to repay customers, as well as an injunction against many of their predatory tactics. But the bigger damage wasn't to Adobe's pocketbook, it was to its reputation.
Adobe had gained the vibe of a company that was at war with its users. It wanted to trap them in a web of subscriptions from which there was no escape. It felt less like a partnership and more like a hostage situation. Adobe didn't think it had to watch its flank. It was the dominant figure in web design, and had been for well over a decade. The company wasn't just a household name. Photoshop was synonymous with the service, to the point that it was used interchangeably with generic terms. Most people didn't even know about competitors. The company had locked its users in a cycle that they didn't expect them to break any time soon.
But there was a new competitor out there, one with a far friendlier face. Chapter 3 - The Canva Insurgency Canva, an Australian-based software company launched in 2013. In some ways, it looked a lot like Adobe right out of the gate. While Adobe focused on high-level users with an emphasis on professionals, Canva was based around a simple browser model. Those who tried it didn't feel like they were trying to solve a complex problem, they just felt like they were having fun. And sure enough, people liked that. When Canva launched, it very quickly got big-money investments from venture capitalists around the
world. In its first year alone, it picked up 750,000 users, but the vast majority of them weren't paying customers. That's because Canva was taking a huge risk that Adobe never did. It was operating on a freemium model. While Adobe started out as an expensive one-time package and became a subscription service, Canva was simply… a website. You could go on the page, access basic templates, and get what you needed, within limits. But if you needed more, Canva had an offer for you. Canva Pro is a bargain compared to Adobe, offering $15 a month or $120 a year deals for their top plans. Canva reached profitability for the first time in 2017,
and has been growing ever since. As of 2026, there are 260 million active monthly users on Canva, and 31 million of them are paid subscribers. Users say the system is more intuitive than Adobe's, and casual users are quickly becoming devoted users as the site gains more and more momentum. So Adobe panicked. And that led to one of their biggest mistakes ever. Believing it needed to compete in the casual web design market, Adobe made a play for another competitor, Figma. It was an independent web design company that had a similar business model to Canva. Adobe made a bold offer of $20 billion dollars in cash and
stock for the company, promising users that Figma would retain a degree of independence. It hoped this would stem the loss of users to competitors like Canva. But many tech experts had seen mergers like this before… and they rarely worked out for the smaller company. The skepticism turned into a crash. As the 2022 merger moved forward, Adobe's stock dropped about 17%. Investors were already nervous about how much debt it would take on. Then regulators stepped in. The Department of Justice and the European Commission both launched antitrust investigations.
What followed was more than a year of back-and-forth, with growing skepticism around the deal… and Adobe's broader strategy. Eventually, both sides walked away and the merger was dead in the water. Because Adobe had failed to secure approval, they were on hook for the $1 billion dollar breakup fee, another hit they could scarcely handle. It was just time for the biggest earthquake to hit the graphic design world. Chapter 4 -The Great Creative Betrayal In 2022, ChatGPT arrived and AI stopped being niche. It became part of the creative mainstream, whether people were ready for it or not. Suddenly,
every company rushed to build their own version. From Google's Gemini to X's Grok, everyone was trying to stay in the race. And it wouldn't be long before Adobe got in on the act. But it's how they did it that raised eyebrows. For almost two decades, Adobe users created everything inside its ecosystem. They'd edit their work with Adobe tools, then upload it to the cloud to store or share. And over time, that content didn't just sit on their machines anymore. It lived on Adobe's servers. And it belonged to them. As of June 2024, users were prompted to agree to new terms of service to continue
operating their Adobe software. This wasn't something new, as the terms and services get updated regularly on most sites. Most people agree without reading the terms and conditions. But this was different. Creatives were now on the lookout to see how all their companies would respond to the growing influx of AI in the creative arts. What they found about Adobe shocked them. The new terms of service required users to grant the company a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to all content uploaded to or processed by Adobe's cloud services. To terrified creatives, that vague phrasing
made it sound like nothing ever created on Adobe fully belonged to the user anymore. This terrifying realization didn't come with a big announcement, but when a mandatory pop-up locked users out of their applications, forcing them to dissect the broad legal jargon that had been hiding in the fine print for years. Across the Adobe userbase, outrage ensued as people expressed their refusal to go along with these new terms. But that would be easier said than done. As Adobe had shifted to the cloud, most users kept the majority of their content stored there. They didn't have access to it outside the Adobe environment. To get access to their account, they needed to agree to the new terms and conditions.
Reports abounded of people being locked out of important documents until they signed, and most did. But the backlash did lead Adobe to clarify that they wouldn't train their AI tool on user data. However, that did little to repair Adobe's reputation among users. Many people wondered if it even was a creative tool first and foremost anymore… or a data-mining operation. Were users doing web design or giving a powerful tech company access to their professional portfolios and classified documents? Because Adobe's AI experiment was just getting started.
Chapter 5 - Firefly: The Cannibal King The tool that had everyone nervous was Adobe Firefly, the company's own proprietary generative AI model. Like all the other big-name AIs, Adobe's entry was tailored towards its userbase. That meant it was essentially a way to automate all the grunt work of graphic design. The tool could aid users in creating both text-to-image and text-to-video material, as well as create its own voice-overs, turn images into videos, and add sound effects to videos and presentations. It attempted to take Adobe's helping hand with
these tasks and fully automate it, taking the work out of Adobe's whole system. But was this a good idea or a massive misunderstanding of their entire business model? On the surface, Adobe Firefly was a hit, to the tune of over 13 billion images generated since its introduction in 2023. It's a staggering number, which may not be a good thing, according to AI critics. The images are created via training on existing images, and the environmental impact of the AI industry's demands on power and water has many worried. A good number of Adobe fans wish the company would have stayed out of AI altogether, but that's unlikely as companies compete for an edge in this new world.
So how did Firefly learn to create images? It trained on millions of images from Adobe's own Stock library, real work submitted by real creators over the years. That means it's based on a massive mix of the commercial Adobe Stock library, openly licensed content, and public domain works. In practice, it's Adobe building a tool that can do a lot of the heavy lifting for its users. But those users aren't beginners. They're using the tool for high-level graphic design work that often has a steep learning curve. Adobe specializes in users with talent and experience, and they're willing to pay well for the best of the best.
Which means that Adobe may be cutting its own legs out from under it. Right now, Adobe Firefly seems to be hitting its target market as the only AI tool specifically designed for graphic design-focused users. But its competitors are evolving all the time, with Gemini in particular shifting its focus to more professional users. Adobe was one of the first to turn creative skill into a service you could subscribe to. But they won't be the last. As it becomes easier to generate high-quality designs, videos, and presentations with just a prompt or a click, their users are going to run into a harder question. What do we need Adobe for anyway?
Right now, Adobe is the top-of-the-line web design software, with individual users and organizations paying premium prices for access to its tools. But that position starts to get shaky as more people shift toward faster, AI-generated alternatives, often for far less money. And once Adobe is no longer seen as the best option, it risks becoming something else in the eyes of its users. Little more than a data-harvesting tool… and no one will be willing to pay $600 for Photoshop anymore. And Wall Street has noticed.
Chapter 6 - The Final Pivot Adobe's stock price doesn't look like the company is on the verge of collapse. As a tech company hovering around $245 a share, no one is expecting the company to go bankrupt any time soon. But those numbers look a lot worse when you zoom out to the five-year comparison. The company once topped out at over $688 a share. That's a precipitous 64.4% slide to its current state. While it dropped heavily in 2022 when the merger was announced and recovered in 2023 thanks to the AI boom. But now, its slide seems to have no end in sight, and it's lost over half its value in the last year alone.
And when the Wall Street sharks smell blood in the water, things rarely get better. Adobe's profits are high because it's found new products to sell to its customers. But its business model is based entirely around selling new things to its loyal customers, locking them into contracts. And that sometimes gets them in trouble for shady business practices. The very industry Adobe helped build is now starting to undermine itself. As AI takes over more of the creative process, the cost of traditional tools starts to look harder and harder to justify.
And Adobe might be throwing dirt on its own grave. Adobe's move into AI carries a real risk. It could end up alienating the very thing that's kept it going…its creative users. Currently, Adobe is teaching those same customers to rely on automation. To produce high-quality work with less effort… and less of the traditional skill in the process. But that creates a strange dependency. Adobe needs those users to stay, even as it trains them to realize they might not need Adobe at all. Especially when cheaper alternatives can deliver similar results. But maybe the customers aren't the point anymore.
Is Adobe truly a creative company anymore? Many analysts of the tech world say not. Rather, like all AI-focused companies, they're transitioning to a heavy business-to-business - or B2B - software model. While users retain the rights to those 13 billion AI-generated images, the proprietary generative model provides an enormous amount of value for Adobe to license to corporate customers. Those 13 billion AI-generated images are all Adobe property, even if the original content created before them isn't. That provides an enormous amount of data for Adobe to offer corporate customers.
That is, as long as the customers stay put. Adobe has had its share of controversy in recent years. But it hasn't shown much sign of slowing down. With a market value well over $90 billion, even regulatory fines tend to be treated as little more than the cost of doing business for big tech. Adobe is likely to go full speed ahead, working to amass more data through Firefly and monetize that for its future as an AI-driven information company. And at that point, will it even need customers anymore? That's the question no one can answer. Adobe's stock price is sliding with no
end in sight. But the company is confident its investors will turn things around. However, if its subscriber base leaves it before it's reached financial viability, the most well-known design software on the internet may have successfully redesigned itself out of existence. Adobe isn't the only company staring at a possible extinction scenario. Check out "AI Is Breaking the Internet. The Collapse Began." for all the terrifying details, or watch this.
