19:20
Concentration camps during the Boer War. Even before Auschwitz, before World War II, before the word " concentration camp" became forever associated with industrial genocide, the British Empire was already using the concept, and they were using it far from Europe, in the dusty, dry interior of South Africa. This happened during the Boer War, and the people who suffered were not soldiers on the front lines. These were women, these were children, these were families who had never held a rifle in their lives. So, let's go back to where it all began. The Second Boer War began in 1899. On the one hand, there was the British Empire at the peak of its power. On the other hand, two small Anglo-Boer republics, the Transvaal and the
Orange Free State. The Boers were descendants of Dutch settlers, stubborn, independent farmers who knew the land like the back of their hand. The British expected a clean, quick victory, but it did not happen. The Boers fought using guerrilla tactics, quick strikes, rapid retreats, and a deep knowledge of the terrain. They used their farms as supply bases, and the British simply could not contain them. By 1900, the British were confused, frustrated, and had exhausted their patience. And it was then that Lord Kitchener took command.
Kitchener believed that if he could not defeat the Boers in open battle, he would defeat them by destroying everything they depended on. So he ordered something brutal, something he called scorched earth. British troops burned farms, torched homes , destroyed crops, killed livestock, poisoned wells, and entire communities watched as generations of labor went up in smoke. And here's the thing: once you burn down someone's house, they have nowhere to go. They have no food. They have no shelter. They become refugees overnight. So the British created the next step-the camps. They called them refugee camps, but they were not places of refuge.
These were places of imprisonment. Over 100 camps were built throughout South Africa, about 45 for Boer civilians and over 60 for black Africans caught up in the chaos. The black camps were larger, harsher, and almost completely ignored by British officials. British soldiers went from farm to farm, rounding up people. Sometimes they offered to take us by cart. Sometimes the rifle encouraged cooperation. Families climbed aboard with everything they could carry, and the army sent them to the camps. You might imagine streets lined with wooden huts or sturdy buildings, but these camps were rows of canvas tents, thin fabric in a harsh climate with no protection from freezing nights or scorching days. Dust swept through everything. The rain turned the ground
into mud. And once people were there, they stayed there. Not a week, not a month. Some stayed for more than a year. Let's talk about the conditions, because this is where the tragedy becomes painfully obvious. Food was limited, very limited. The British issued rations that barely kept people alive, and that was on good days. If the head of the family was still in the field fighting the British, rations were reduced even further. It was a punishment of starvation. The water was unclean. Sanitation barely existed. One restroom could serve 100 people, and sometimes more. Diseases spread like wildfire. Measles, typhus, dysentery - all of these broke out in communities that had already
lost everything. Children suffered the most. Their immune systems could not cope with these conditions. Mothers watched as their sons and daughters grew weaker every day without medicine, without food, without hope. Many children died before their families realized what was happening. By the end of the war, at least 27,000 Boer civilians had died. 22,000 of them were children. The numbers of black Africans were even worse, although records were almost never kept. Modern estimates suggest that over 20,000 people died in the camps for blacks. They received even less food, even less medical care, and were often forced to work. So how do we know all this? Because one woman decided she needed to see it for herself. Her
name was Emily Hobhouse. She traveled to South Africa in 1901 alone, without official support, and visited the camps. What she saw shocked her. She saw starving children, sick mothers, and tents filled with people lying in the mud. She spoke weekly to families who had lost a child. She walked past rows of graves. She wrote everything down. One case stood out, a young girl named Lizzie van Zyl. Lizzie died in the Bloemfontein camp. She was so thin, so weak, that her photograph became a symbol of the cruelty of the entire system.
Hobhouse wrote: "I saw a child dying of hunger. " The doctors told me that she had no illness except hunger." When Hobhouse published her findings in Britain, officials tried to discredit her. Some called her hysterical. Some said she didn't understand military necessity. But she didn't back down. The British government eventually launched an investigation, the Fawcett Commission, and it confirmed Hobhouse's words. The camps were deadly because they were poorly managed, underfunded, and simply not designed to sustain human life. So why did the British do this?
Why build camps that have become death traps? Because the British command believed that the Boers would not stop fighting until their families were under control. And because the empire often operated with one cold assumption: that the suffering of civilians was the price of victory. There was also a deeper problem - racial attitudes. British officers often considered Boers to be backward farmers, and black Africans were treated even worse, ignored, underfed, and herded into camps with little supervision. Their deaths were not even counted properly. By 1902, the war was finally over. The Treaty of Verinig ended hostilities, and the camps were gradually closed. Those who survived emerged into a world where their homes were reduced to ashes, fields
destroyed, and lives shattered. For many families, there was no home to return to. The land was burned, livestock disappeared, entire communities were wiped out. The trauma did not disappear with the end of the war. Among the Boers, who were later called Afrikaners, the memory of the camps became a national wound. It has fueled outrage for decades. It shaped politics and identity. And for black South Africans, the tragedy was even deeper. Their suffering was largely hidden, buried under colonial records that barely mentioned them. Their deaths were ignored or not recorded at all. However, their experiences foreshadowed the racial inequality that later developed into apartheid. British concentration camps were not the
first in history. Spain had used similar camps during the Cuban rebellion in the 1890s, but the British camps were the first modern version, run by a major industrial power supported by railways, bureaucracy and military planning. They weren't designed to kill, but they killed anyway, and that's part of what makes them so disturbing. They show how suffering can arise not only from hatred, but also from paperwork, from orders, from politics. And there is something else. These camps became a model, not always intentionally but historically, for how later governments used the internment of civilians as a weapon. From the Soviet Gulags to the camps of Nazi Germany, one can see echoes of what Britain did in South Africa. The idea that civilians
can be rounded up, isolated, controlled, and punished to achieve a political or military goal. Today, throughout South Africa, one can still find memorials, rows of white stones, children's names, museums that tell the stories of people who never expected to become victims of a global empire. Yet in Britain this story is much less well known. It rarely appears in school textbooks. This is not part of the common image of empire. Because when most people imagine the British Empire, they think of red coats, railways and Victorian manners, not barbed wire, scorched fields and starving children. But that's also part of the story. The British concentration camps during the Boer War were not the largest.
They were not the last. But they were among the first to show how a modern government could use its power, its soldiers, its supplies, its documents, to control the civilian population on a massive scale. And when strategy becomes more important than humanity, those who never choose to fight suffer the most.
