23:11
So, I want to show you a plan that has been in the works for almost 50 years. It has been agreed upon by almost every government in the world, and this plan covers where you should live, what you should have, what you should eat, and how you should pay for things. Most people have probably never heard of it has been called various things over the decades, such as " Agenda 21." " Agenda 21" is a kind of code name for a master plan that emerged at the UN to change the world's political and economic system to one of total collectivism. And in order to do this, people cannot be allowed to have independence. They should depend on the state. To control humanity, you need to gather everyone in large cities
. We have to gather them all and stack them. Make them dependent on the state for food, housing, electricity, water -everything. This is the dirty secret behind Agenda 21. When I first heard about this, my reaction was: This sounds like a crazy conspiracy theory. It's not possible for a group of people to sit in a room somewhere and write a plan to drive everyone off their land into the cities and make them dependent on the state. In addition, back in 1976, at a UN conference, the governments of the world recorded that land, and I quote, " cannot be considered an ordinary asset controlled by individuals." And in 1992, 178 governments signed a 350- page plan for how humanity should live, produce, and consume over the next century.
In 2015, every country at the UN agreed to the goal of giving every person in the world a legal identity by 2030. The World Economic Forum released a video stating that by 2030 you will have no privacy, own nothing, and be happy. And last week, the European Central Bank launched the first element of the digital euro. On Monday, September 21, we will launch "Pontes". So, " Pontes," in short, is a digital euro available to banks so they can transact with each other using tokenized assets and distributed ledger technology. We very much hope that the legislation currently under discussion on the digital euro will be completed and finalized by the end of this year, and the sooner the better. And by the way, all of this is published for public review. And
if you do decide to read it, you will see that it is a master plan for accounting and controlling the world's resources. This is an accounting and control plan. Accounting and control of all the land, all the water, all the minerals, all the plants, all the animals, all the construction, all the means of production, all the food, all the energy, all the information and all the people in the world. And this plan was agreed upon by 179 countries back in 1992. This is a United Nations plan. It is called Agenda for the 21st Century. And so many of us in the world think that, well, sustainable development- it sounds so great
. Isn't it about recycling, creative reuse, creating energy and food resources for everyone? And the answer is no. This is not true at all. This is about population relocation to urban centers, concentrated urban centers, and evictions from rural areas . All systems must be brought into harmony in order to control them all, because when systems are not aligned, when they are not balanced or synchronized with each other, they cannot be controlled centrally. And the goal of the "Agenda for the 21st Century" is a single world government and complete control from a single center. If you think that sounds a bit sinister, I guess those in power aren't too bothered by such accusations, because what does "evil" even mean? Here's what a tech
billionaire thinks about what evil really is. If you're angry, at least you're competent. And if you're angry, you're not bad. So, you're actually maybe even a little good, because at least you're doing something. So in this video, I'm going to show you this plan in their own words, from 1976 all the way to their goals for 2030. I'll show how this went from just an idea about land to this global agenda, how the world's biggest financial managers got involved, and why it explains so much of what's happening in the world right now. At the end, I'll tell you how I prepare for it and what I think about it. So, with that said, let's get down to business.
Hello, my name is Andre Jik. I hope you are all right. Come for the finance, stay for the 2030 Agenda. This is the master plan for humanity that central planners, that is, people with all the leverage over institutions, have for the year 2030. This plan actually exists. This is not a conspiracy theory. The reason some people think this is because this plan has changed names throughout history. So, to prove to you that this is a real thing, let me show you where it came from and how it has evolved over time. Ultimately, I think it's so important because it explains a lot of what we see in the world today. But it all started in 1976. You see, the governments of the world came together with a certain idea.
Their idea was that land should not be considered an ordinary asset. That year, the United Nations held a conference called "Habitat." United Nations Conference on Human Settlements. So, in the 1970s, they had a problem. The world's population was growing rapidly. People were moving en masse to cities in developing countries as the poorest regions of the world grew faster than governments could provide housing. So world leaders got together at this conference and thought, "How do we solve this? Okay, soon there will be
more of them than us, and eventually they will want to own the land and the assets, and that's just not sustainable." So, here's the plan they all agreed to. One part of the plan included a section on land. In the official recommendations of that conference, governments wrote that land, due to its unique nature, "cannot be considered as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to ." End of quote. Isn't that right? They also wrote that land ownership is "the primary instrument for the accumulation and concentration of wealth, and that it contributes to social injustice."
Their conclusion was that state control over land was necessary. This means that governments could not fully implement their plan if they-rather than individual free- market landowners-had the final say over land use. In practice, this meant regulating what you could and could not do with your land. Taking out some of the increase in its value, right? Use of taxation. Using state ownership to control how cities will develop over time. So you could still own the land on paper, right? But under this concept, control over it would increasingly lie with central planners. All this was recorded in 1976. However, that conference did not simply create a plan. A few years later, the UN established a permanent human settlements agency, which is today known
as UN-Habitat. This conference continues to be held every 20 years to advance this plan. In 1996, for example, they held Habitat II in Turkey, and then Habitat III in Ecuador in 2016. It was there that the world adopted the so-called " New Urban Agenda," designed to continue the goals of the 2030 Agenda. Again, the idea is that land, if there are too many people in the world, will become too important to be left in the control of individuals. Okay, it was just an idea at the time, right? Their plan didn't have a very clear structure. He didn't have any specific goals. It did n't even have a name, as it didn't happen until 16 years later. That's when what's called the "Agenda for the 21st Century " was born-a plan for how they would implement new
rules for the 21st century. And that's what these rules are. But before I explain that, I want to talk about the most important investment I've ever made in my life, and that is, of course, my health. I'm not one to like making appointments or going to doctors, and I try to avoid it as long as possible. This year I injured my back and kept putting off my visit because I have to call during business hours, wait on the line, and if I finally manage to talk to someone, they say the next available window is only in 4 months. If you have something you've been meaning to get tested for, you know exactly what I'm talking about. And here comes today's sponsor - Zocdoc. Zocdoc is a free site where
you can find local doctors who work with insurance: over 150,000 specialists in 200+ specialties in all 50 states. You get real patient reviews and detailed profiles, so you decide who fits your needs. You see real free hours in the calendar and instantly book a visit with one click. I can confirm this because I used the service myself. I chose the doctor myself and was in the office the very next day. I didn't have to hang up on the phone and then wait weeks for an appointment. I left with a referral the very next day after booking. It was an incredibly easy experience-from booking to the actual visit to the doctor. And when I arrived, I was admitted within 30 minutes. Most appointments take place within 24-72 hours, and sometimes you can see a doctor
the same day. I know clicking the link seems like a small thing, but it's an important step toward taking your health as seriously as you would your investments or anything else. I highly recommend Zocdoc to all my friends and family. You can go to zocdoc.com/andre. The link is the first item in the description below. This is zocdoc.com/andre. Thank you Zocdoc for sponsoring this video and helping us all take better care of our health. Now let's get back to the topic. So, in June 1992, central planners gathered for the so- called "Earth Summit." It was there that 178 governments agreed on a document called "Agenda for the 21st Century.
" And it was, in essence, about their plan for the 21st century. " Agenda for the 21st Century" was huge. It was about 350 pages long and went far beyond urban planning. There was a whole section about changing consumption patterns. That is, they wanted to change people's behavior regarding how much of everything we buy and use. There was also a section on how human settlements should be planned, including land use. There were sections on agriculture, energy, water, forests, right? It was, in essence, a blueprint for how they believed humanity should live. And to understand how important this was, you have to realize what exactly they were trying to do. You see, that
was the plan for almost everything. Isn't that right? The "Agenda for the 21st Century" is divided into four parts. The first part covered social and economic aspects: poverty, health, population, consumption, and where people live. The second part concerns the planet's resources: land, water, forests, oceans, farming, and energy. And the third part is about who should implement it. It names specific groups such as governments, businesses, local authorities, and even farmers, workers, and youth. is how they are going to pay for the implementation of this plan. The United Nations has estimated that implementing this would cost about
$600 billion per year. In short, for the first time in history, almost every government in the world has agreed to this single grand plan for how humanity should live, what to produce, what to eat, and who should be responsible for making it happen. They even created a body called the Commission on Sustainable Development. And this is to monitor whether countries are implementing this plan. Technically, Agenda 21 was not a legal agreement. There was no contract. So no country was legally obligated to adhere to it. But for some reason, politics around the world has started to become visible, has n't it? So, this is how this agenda began to become a reality. One of the parts of the "Agenda
for the 21st Century" included a section called " Local Government Initiatives in Support of the Agenda for the 21st Century." This section called on local governments around the world, city councils, urban planners, in essence, to create their own local " Agenda for the 21st Century." And an organization called ICLEI, which today calls itself "Local Governments for Sustainable Development," that's how these ideas gradually began to be implemented through zoning commissions, city planners, and regional development programs. In fact, they used all those state structures that no one paid attention to. In the same year, 1992, the US also adopted it. In fact, there is a video of Nancy Pelosi introducing a resolution to Congress calling for a national sustainable
development strategy, and I quote, " in accordance with the principles of Agenda 21. See for yourself. Well, the Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act, as it's called, gives us the opportunity to continue the Earth Summit's important work in developing its blueprint, the "Agenda for the 21st Century," for global environmental action. H. Con. Res. 353 outlines a comprehensive national strategy for sustainable development in accordance with the principles of the " Agenda for the 21st Century", which is to be coordinated under the leadership of a special office and under the direction of a high-ranking official. So this proposal actually had 71 sponsors and administration support. And a year later, in 1993, President Clinton created the President's Council
on Sustainable Development by executive order to translate all of these ideas into US policy. This afternoon, I am announcing the creation of the President's Council on Sustainable Development to help shape policies to grow the economy and preserve the environment for our children and our children's children. Bringing together the most innovative people from business, government, the environmental movement, the civil rights movement, and the labor movement. But over the next 20 years, as these policies began to turn into rules and laws, more and more people began to wake up and ask what the hell was going on.
One of these people was Rosa Coire. She said the gist of this plan was that central planners wanted to take inventory or quantify and control everything: natural resources, land, water, energy, food and ultimately people. If this sounds like some crazy idea, at one of the recent World Economic Forums there were speakers who said pretty much the same thing, that every natural resource in the world needs to be tracked and shouldn't be free. When we talk about capital, we tend to think only about financial capital, about cash, financial assets, but we know that this is not the only value on which our economies depend. We know that every aspect of every part of the economy is fundamentally dependent on nature, as you emphasized.
The air we breathe, the water we drink, the soil, the oceans, and ultimately the food we eat, the minerals needed for technology and infrastructure. And without these forms of value, these forms of natural capital, we wouldn't have economies. They are the fundamental building blocks of our economies. And we need to start recognizing water as a valuable resource. Therefore, water should be better managed, it should be better valued. And now we need to look at the economics of water not just in monetary terms, but also in terms of governance, recognizing water as a common good that we must manage through a Have we really managed to vaccinate everyone in the world? No. So highlighting water as a global common good and what it means to work together,
looking at it from both a global common good perspective and a self-interest perspective, because it has such a parallel. This is not only important, but it is also important because we were unable to solve those problems that had similar characteristics. And water is something that people understand. So, it is also important to involve citizens in this process and to some extent experiment with this concept of the common good. Can we achieve results this time where we have failed miserably at other times? So in 2015, all 193 members of the United Nations came together and adopted the "2030 Agenda."
This time, however, it was much more specific about what their goals were. Like, for example, the first of them is the deadline. Agenda 21 was simply a vision for the 21st century, which was somewhat open-ended in that there was no time frame, but Agenda 2030 has a timetable for achieving all of these goals, with less than 4 years left, 2030. The second point they were very specific about was who it applies to. You see, before that, the UN had the so-called " Millennium Development Goals, " which ran from 2000 to 2015. And they were mainly supposed to help developing countries fight against phenomena such as extreme poverty, hunger, and disease in the poorest parts of the world. But the 2030 Agenda is what the UN calls universal, meaning it applies to every country,
including rich countries like the United States. The third thing they were very specific about is the scope, right? They listed 17 goals and 169 tasks. By the way, most of them actually sound altruistic. They sound good. As if we are doing this to improve the lives of humanity. Who could possibly be against overcoming world hunger or access to clean drinking water, right? But when you actually read the documents, a few things start to stand out. Goal 11, for example, concerns cities and calls for, quote, " planning for sustainable human settlements." This is an echo of 1976 again. Goal 12 is about consumption, that is, changing how much we buy, how much we use and how much we produce. Again, the same idea from that section of the "
Agenda for the 21st Century." Goal eight is about expanding access to banking and financial services for all, because they want to bring every person in the world into the financial system formally. And this is what makes digital money possible. Then there is goal 16, task nine. It says, and I quote: "By 2030, ensure legal identification for all, including birth registration." So, every person in the world will eventually be officially identified. There is also Goal 17, which says that the way to do all of this will be through partnerships and collaboration with non-governmental organizations. So, this entire plan will not be implemented only by UN forces. It will also be implemented through the policies of some of the largest
companies and institutions around the world. Now wait. At this point you might ask, "How can they all agree to this? How do we get all these companies to agree to this?" This sounds like a grand conspiracy. But it's not, because if you can get the people who control the flows of capital, that is, money, to reward companies that adhere to these goals and punish those that do n't, then this is how it's done. This is where what is called ESG comes from. So, this stands for environmental, social, and governance regulation. It is essentially a way of evaluating companies on metrics that go beyond simple profit-making, such as carbon emissions or the demographics of their employees. This is not a conspiracy. ESG actually appeared in 2004 in a report
prepared within the framework of the UN Global Compact called "Those who care, those who win". They essentially said, " If the world's biggest investors are pushing companies in this direction, money does all the coercive work for you." And the largest investor in the world is BlackRock, which today manages over $10 trillion, which means it has a huge share of the votes in these companies through so- called trustees. If you buy ETFs instead of individual stocks, you are likely giving the voting power of your capital to these asset management companies like BlackRock. Actually, here's CEO Larry Fink in 2017. How can we force change when it is so gradual and slow? Hmm, how about doing something more radical?
Well, behavior has to change, and that's what we're asking companies to do: you have to force behavior change, and at BlackRock we do that. So, in this video, he talks about the pressure on companies about who they hire. He promoted the idea of diversity. And the reason he can do this is because when you control so many shares, you can make companies change without any vote. And if they don't agree with you and don't support your plan, you're just using your vote to actually put someone else in charge. Here's how it works. By 2020, BlackRock's annual letter to company executives stated that sustainability would become the new standard for BlackRock's investing. But already in 2023, Larry Fink said that he stopped using the
term ESG because it had become too politicized. However, he did not give up on his ambitious goal, as in 2025 Larry Fink became co-chair of the World Economic Forum. Today, this idea lives on at the World Economic Forum, where the world's most influential people gather in Davos, Switzerland, to discuss implementing this global agenda. And they want to do it as soon as possible. In 2019, the WEF signed a formal partnership with the UN to help advance the 2030 Agenda. And this is where things get really interesting. Back in 2016, the World Economic Forum published a video with eight predictions about what the world would be like in 2030. These are not my
predictions. These are their predictions for the world, and they sound a bit crazy, but that's what it is. The first prediction: you will own nothing and be happy. Everything you need in life, you will simply rent, and it will be delivered to you by drone. This quote, "You will own nothing and be happy," actually comes from an essay by a Danish politician, but the title of that essay is much more dystopian. The title was: " Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, I have no privacy, and life has never been better." end of quote. Of course, it went viral, right? And the World Economic Forum responded: "This was not our forecast. It was just a thought experiment, right? A "what if" scenario "It would be nice." Isn't that right? So, that was one of
their predictions. Now number two. The US will not be the world's leading superpower. Is n't that right? And I think we're seeing this in the real world right now. We are seeing the US effectively losing its reserve currency status. The country is supposedly shrinking to the level of a regional state. Some say it has already happened. It is no longer a world superpower. It's just that by 2030, more people will recognize it. The third prediction is that they will print organs. And that probably means printing food in labs too. We're already seeing evidence of this, because the fourth prediction is that you'll eat less meat because it's better for the environment and for our health. In fact, you're more likely to be eating
processed insects as protein made in a lab somewhere. We take insects and process them into a dairy alternative. This creates a rich and creamy liquid that looks and acts exactly like dairy products. Entomilk is very rich in protein, fats, calcium, iron and zinc, which is very good for you. The billion people will be, quote, displaced by climate, and you have to prepare to take in refugees. You will become a minority in your nation, most likely. The sixth prediction-you will pay taxes if you emit carbon dioxide. That is, if you consider yourself smart and don't want to drive an electric car because you might not trust it, well, you'll
pay for it. Is n't that right? The seventh prediction is a kind of trifle. This is that we will fly to Mars and maybe find some alien life, but the eighth prediction is to buckle up, because those Western values you have will be tested for strength. Today, a surprising number of all these predictions are already moving in this direction, slowly becoming a reality. However, people generally tend to dislike such changes. They resist them, which means that central planners need the opportunity to push this agenda further. A good example of this was 2020. The World Economic Forum saw an opportunity. In June 2020, in the midst of the pandemic, World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab launched something called "The Great Reset."
He said the pandemic is a rare but narrow window of opportunity to rethink, rethink and reboot our world. He published a book called "COVID-19: The Great Reboot." The idea was that the pandemic had already destroyed almost everything, so this was their perfect moment to rebuild the economy around what they call What is this? Klaus Schwab said that the world has basically three models to choose from. The first is shareholder capitalism, followed by most Western countries, where companies make money for shareholders. The second is state capitalism, which is actually what China does, where the government makes the decisions, the state makes the decisions, right?
If this sounds familiar, it's the same struggle I talked about in my video about artificial intelligence-who will ultimately control this technology and the economy. Will it be people with money or representatives of the government? Schwab's answer was: neither. is the so-called stakeholder capitalism. Stakeholder capitalism, not to be confused with shareholder capitalism, is noted as " defining private corporations as trustees of society." In other words, a company should be accountable not only to its owners, it should also serve society, right? And it must work to achieve the goals set for everyone. In that essay, he explicitly stated which goals he was referring to: the Paris Climate Agreement and the
UN Sustainable Development Goals, which, of course, are the " 2030 Agenda." So, consider what all this really means. The not the owners who will decide. This will not be a communist- style system where the state owns everything. This would be a fusion of both options, wouldn't it? The largest corporations will collaborate with governments and global institutions, working together to achieve these common goals, right? Common goals that central planners set for the world a long time ago. That's what it is. He even wrote that Chinese state capitalism is likely to evolve towards this stakeholder model. So, regardless of the path- Western capitalism or Chinese state capitalism-we are moving in the same direction. So, to put it all together: the UN actually
formulates these goals, the World Economic Forum brings together governments, billionaires, and the biggest companies to promote them, and asset management companies like BlackRock use their capital to keep everyone on track. And now the man who runs BlackRock also helps run the World Economic Forum. Okay, to sum up all of the above, here are my personal thoughts on this. To me, Agenda 2030 is more or less what is happening to the world and, in my opinion, what will continue to happen. Because when I look at the world, the thing that strikes me most is that humanity as a species has reached a point where we are now at the level of population reproduction, right? Which is about 2.2 or 2.3. This means we are heading towards the
extinction list. It's only 2.1. One could argue that the main purpose of life is to create copies of ourselves. Our species needs this to continue its existence. And not so long ago this was true. We were actually worried that there would be too many people in the world. But now we have the opposite problem. If you look at it from a biological perspective, in order for an animal to stop reproducing, it must be kept in captivity. Just like animals in a zoo. And the conditions have to be so terrible that we all say together, "Oh, reproduction? "No, thank you, I'll manage." I want to protect my child from my reality. Is this a coincidence or the result of some external force controlling all of this? If such a guiding force exists, let's think like it,
like central planners. Why might they need something like this? It sounds like evil, but it really isn't. This is self-preservation. Central planners look around and see that there are too many mouths to feed, and soon there will be a lot of unproductive people, because we are getting closer to creating the last technology that humanity will ever need -AI and robots. And this technology may make us immortal one day. At the very least, it will extend our lives by a couple of decades, and perhaps soon by several centuries. What will this do to wealth? Money.
This will lead to the majority of wealth being concentrated in the hands of a few. It's simple math if you understand how compound interest works. That's why Warren Buffett, for example, had a fortune of approximately $84 billion in 2020. But he earned more than 95% of his money after he turned 65. He didn't get rich because he was a genius at 20. He got rich because he started very early, and time multiplied his money exponentially. But he had a normal lifespan. What if someone could live for centuries? Then 99.99999% of the world's wealth would be concentrated in the top 1%. History shows that when economic conditions become bad enough, when there is a large gap between the winners and the losers, revolutions happen. No one can exit such
systems by voting. Revolutions have been the only way out throughout history. In fact, Thomas Jefferson encouraged this with his famous quote. So, I think they know what's coming, based on history. They seem to be saying, "Well, we can see where this is going if it keeps up, right?" We need fewer people in the world, because the way from here to there is to that utopian world that Elon Musk talks about, where no one needs money because robots and AI do everything for us. Will this path from here to that ideal world be extremely painful, because this transformation does not happen overnight. Entire sectors of people must be displaced. Like people who will lose jobs, income, and assets because they can't afford them in this changing environment. These are domino and
cascading effects. And what will that do to society? This will make people angry. So here's how you can avoid this or mitigate it before something like a violent revolution. Implement a global policy that creates dependence on the state. You make sure everyone is on their best behavior. If you depend on the government for food and money, you won't break the rules. But just in case there is a potential for an uprising in the future, perhaps we can create conditions that can mitigate it. For example? Economic pressure. Maybe some disease, maybe war, maybe AI that got out of control. A combination of all of this. I feel like Morpheus right now,
explaining to Neo how the world works. Is it really that hard to believe? So maybe this is all planned, and if so, I think we should expect more regional wars, more conflicts, more diseases, more weather disasters, more events around the world that in one way or another reduce the population and slow its growth. This is my very pessimistic understanding of the world. As I get older, it seems to dominate my thoughts more and more, but there is also an optimistic one. The optimistic thing is that perhaps none of this is planned. Maybe this is all just a mouse utopia, "Universe-25." Yes, it was an experiment when, in 1968, a scientist named John Calhoun built what he called a mouse utopia. It was a mouse city with
, no predators, no disease, and there was room for about 3,000 mice. It all started with just four pairs of mice. And initially the population exploded, peaking at around 2,200 individuals. The society was in perfect harmony, but at a certain point their society began to fall apart. Male mice that were unable to find a role in society They began to attack others. Mothers abandoned or even attacked their young. There was a group that Calhoun called " handsome men," but they had completely stopped mating and fighting. They spent their days just eating, sleeping, and taking care of themselves.
Eventually, the birth rate stopped, and the entire colony became extinct. Although they never lacked food or space. He concluded that when a society satisfies all physical needs but fails to provide purpose or meaningful roles, it tends to destroy itself from within. Fortunately, we are not mice. So we control our own thoughts and our own destiny. Therefore, we do not have to self-destruct in our own nihilism. But perhaps that is exactly what is happening now. So I honestly don't know which story is true. Maybe that's the plan. Maybe it's a mouse utopia, or a little bit of everything, or maybe you're just stuck in a deep YouTube rabbit hole at 2 a.m. and the algorithm thinks you like that.
Go get some sleep. In any case, I focus on two things for preparation: ownership and independence. If we're moving towards a world where you own less, then I want to own things like real estate and physical goods that I can actually hold and see, right? If money becomes digital, programmable, and controllable, I want to own a portion of my wealth in a version that no one can freeze. Which no one can turn off, which to me means Bitcoin in private storage. Maybe some gold and silver. I want to avoid debt and keep some cash. Keep a stock of food and essentials for several months, just in case. And I also try to pay attention to such things. If I'm wrong, the worst case scenario is overtraining, right?
I am quite satisfied with this. I now premium section, with a full overview of how I allocate my investments, as well as access to these videos a day early. Link below. Thank you very much for watching. See you here next time. Take care of yourself. Peace be upon you.
